...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Lateral-G Open Discussions > Project Updates
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #141  
Old 05-06-2009, 02:53 PM
tjbruning tjbruning is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 466
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MoparCar View Post
With the lowering of the car in the rear, will you have to modify your outer wheel tubs for clearance? Basically doing a "bump" to the outer to make room for the tire? The mini tub does the inside nicely but so many mopars are tight on the outer. Without sucking the tires in they are very close to the outer tub as I'm sure you know. I'm building a Challenger and I keep looking at this while doing mock up that's why I'm asking and looking for ideas from a Pro Build.....

Thanks! Wes
Ned had the tubs done at the last shop and there is plenty of room. Also, Challengers are wider at the belt line than Cudas (1 1/2") which makes it difficult to bring the wheel out as far since there is less clearance at the top of the tire.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #142  
Old 05-06-2009, 02:54 PM
tjbruning tjbruning is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 466
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 96z28ss View Post
Does look nice, lower.

When are you going to get wheels for the car?
Bob, you feeling ok?
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #143  
Old 05-06-2009, 03:13 PM
96z28ss's Avatar
96z28ss 96z28ss is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Portland,OR
Posts: 2,024
Thanks: 18
Thanked 10 Times in 6 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bruning Auto Design View Post
Bob, you feeling ok?
well once you put an actuall wheel in there it looked like it needed to be lower.
__________________
1969 Camaro LS2/T56 D1SC
www.automotivedesigneng.com
Special thanks to: DPE Wheel / Columbia Parts Company / US Collision / T. Bruning
Reply With Quote
  #144  
Old 05-06-2009, 05:20 PM
DOOM's Avatar
DOOM DOOM is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: South Side Chicago
Posts: 2,912
Thanks: 7
Thanked 64 Times in 40 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DRJDVM's '69 View Post
This is the proposed new stance once the front k-member and rear brackets are modified. The plan is to basically "notch" the front frame, move the k-members up into the frame and then "shorten" the rear upper shock mounts

This will make the new ride height be almost as low as the "fully dropped" original stance if I leave the "standard" set up

By doing this it will still allow me to have about 5 inches ground clearence at the lowest point of the crossmember at ride height and plenty of clearence in the back. I will need to mod the tunnel to clear the driveshaft, but not a big deal... so a much better stance without making the car have undriveable ground clearence..






A 1000x better....much more aggressive of a look. I can also fine tune it with the Air Ride......its gonna be more work and more $$ but the 4x4 look would kill the rest of the car..... if it doesnt sit right, the rest of the cars can be wicked but it will never be "right'
Ned thats perfect !!! Thats the way it should be I like the fender edge just above the rim lip
__________________
Mario
USCOLLISION
Reply With Quote
  #145  
Old 05-06-2009, 06:22 PM
rjsjea's Avatar
rjsjea rjsjea is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Oregon
Posts: 667
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

........never thought those rims could look too small on the front of a car, good choice goin 19's

New ride height looks good.



-Rob
__________________
RobS
71 Demon, AlterK - 4 link GenIII hemi conversion
66 Rambler Classic Wagon, LS conversion -Scott's IFS/4bar-bagged
Reply With Quote
  #146  
Old 05-06-2009, 08:05 PM
DRJDVM's '69's Avatar
DRJDVM's '69 DRJDVM's '69 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Manteca, CA
Posts: 1,299
Thanks: 2
Thanked 48 Times in 26 Posts
Default

My thought exactly Rob...... the 18 looks small to me too.

Yeah the wheel openings are huge on the e-bodies... thats why I felt going with a 19/20 combo would be perfect. I'm not a big fan of the huge wheel look on alot of cars, but the bottom line is that an e-body is a pretty big car...so it works.

My goal was to have a ride height stance where the rim edge was very close to the wheelhouse edge....barely/no sidewall showing up top

Yes the car is minitubbed in the rear...done at the last shop...to put it nicely...they work but its not very pretty back there....
Reply With Quote
  #147  
Old 05-06-2009, 10:56 PM
joe440's Avatar
joe440 joe440 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SoCal
Posts: 164
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

coming along great, love the ride height
Reply With Quote
  #148  
Old 05-07-2009, 06:46 AM
CAMAROBOY69 CAMAROBOY69 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 445
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Thats my favorite year Cuda and its looking great so far. If I was to ever buy another car project it would definetly be a 70 Cuda.
__________________
Adam_______Offical Car Name "ILLUSION"
383 Stroker, Stock cast heads, T-56 tranny, 4.11 gears, 2002 T/A dash, 4th gen interior including seatbelts, power lumbar seats, 18" Budnik Wheels,Hydratech Hydraboost
ILLUSION Website
--------------My Car on Lateral-g.net----------- Need something designed?-AdFabDesign
Reply With Quote
  #149  
Old 05-07-2009, 09:43 AM
bentfab's Avatar
bentfab bentfab is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Vendor
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 762
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DRJDVM's '69 View Post
My thought exactly Rob...... the 18 looks small to me too.

Yeah the wheel openings are huge on the e-bodies... thats why I felt going with a 19/20 combo would be perfect. I'm not a big fan of the huge wheel look on alot of cars, but the bottom line is that an e-body is a pretty big car...so it works.

My goal was to have a ride height stance where the rim edge was very close to the wheelhouse edge....barely/no sidewall showing up top

Yes the car is minitubbed in the rear...done at the last shop...to put it nicely...they work but its not very pretty back there....
This is with a 19 out back. I personally would like it a little lower but that's what the owner want's. These cars are a little tricky to make look right.
__________________
Follow us on Instagram = @bentcustom

www.bentcustomandperformance.com

Last edited by bentfab; 11-08-2010 at 11:19 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #150  
Old 05-07-2009, 09:54 AM
DRJDVM's '69's Avatar
DRJDVM's '69 DRJDVM's '69 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Manteca, CA
Posts: 1,299
Thanks: 2
Thanked 48 Times in 26 Posts
Default

Mark....that stance is pretty damn nice too..but I agree that it could go just a tad lower (especially since you are doing so much fab you can set it lower but not compromise clearence etc etc).

I had to do a double take on the rim... it took me a minute to realize that you had the center but not the hoop

I love the work you are doing on that car....very nice.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net