...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Lateral-G Open Discussions > Off Topic Forums
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 08-05-2009, 10:33 AM
HRBS's Avatar
HRBS HRBS is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,190
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Thanks for the info Mark.
But still... a car that gets 14/16 (city/highway) vs 16/18 (city/highway) [4 mpg combined] isnt THAT much better.
__________________
HRBS on Facebook
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-05-2009, 07:40 PM
caper150's Avatar
caper150 caper150 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Mantorville, MN
Posts: 205
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Look at this Volvo they blow up, and the 2 Explorers waiting in the wings,In my mind not clunkers at all. The problem with this whole thing is that the people who are driviing clunkers drive them for a reason,they can't afford a new one.I have a 94 Explorer that my 16yr old daughter drives,but only working 2 part time on call jobs I certainly can't afford another payment on top of the 2 I have now.Now if they would give me a good deal on my pickup I would consider it but now they just give me a low ball trade in value.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=waj2K...x=0&playnext=1
__________________
__________________________________
Darryl

My projects

1965 Ford Galaxie Big Block and 4Doors Project HULK
1966 Ford Galaxie 2 Door Sedan Project unnamed 4.6L Crown Vic runnig gear
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-05-2009, 08:20 PM
Brigzee's Avatar
Brigzee Brigzee is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Kennewick WA
Posts: 34
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Why not give these cars to people that can't afford to buy a new car that are driving huge piles of sh*t that burn two quarts of oil a week. (Everyone has been stuck driving behind one of them)
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-05-2009, 10:22 PM
mazspeed's Avatar
mazspeed mazspeed is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Campbell Ca
Posts: 2,005
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by XcYZ View Post
What a waste... on many levels. I'm so glad my taxes went to buy and destroy a perfectly useable car.

The Feds can't even run Cash for Clunkers right, I can only imagine how F'd up our healthcare would be with them running it.

Yeah but it's the scumbags that will take a decent idea or decent in theory and make it bad by doing things like this. People who do this are crooks IMHO.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-06-2009, 06:10 AM
almcbri's Avatar
almcbri almcbri is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: OK
Posts: 982
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

you know I have a huge problem with this. I had no idea they went about it this way. What I think about is the families that are struggling to get by and maybe their transportation is way worse off. Couldn't they use a decent running car?

Maybe I am missing the boat. Yes it has boosted sells for ford, but why couldn't the cars be donated and used as transportation for people struggling to get by. I guess it goes hand in hand, we have some people who don't even try to help themselves where others are always trying to but are still back in a hole. (sorry, I am getting off of topic) RANT OVER!

Does this mean are metal prices will decrease? Or is there not enough clunker cars cycling to cause any significant drop in metal prices?
__________________
1968 Camaro LS1/T56, Hotchkis Springs, Tubular Arms, AFCO sway bar, C5 brakes, VWW 18" V40's http://s14.photobucket.com/albums/a3...1968%20Camaro/
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 08-06-2009, 12:40 PM
MarkM66's Avatar
MarkM66 MarkM66 is offline
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: St. Louis MO
Posts: 1,962
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

If I had a sh!t box that qualified, I'd be buying a new car too.

Hell, might as well get in on something I'm helping to pay for.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 08-06-2009, 01:27 PM
kennyd's Avatar
kennyd kennyd is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: nw arkansas
Posts: 917
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkM66 View Post
If I had a sh!t box that qualified, I'd be buying a new car too.

Hell, might as well get in on something I'm helping to pay for.
i saw a add " get 4500 for cfc and another 4500 from chrysler " thats 9k you get off a new chrysler . i dont think i would take 9k to drive one !
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 08-07-2009, 03:34 AM
redfire69's Avatar
redfire69 redfire69 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 933
Thanks: 170
Thanked 61 Times in 33 Posts
Default

So it looks like congress just approved 2 billion more. OMG!
__________________
Ron
69 Camaro Redfire
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 08-07-2009, 06:16 AM
MarkM66's Avatar
MarkM66 MarkM66 is offline
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: St. Louis MO
Posts: 1,962
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kennyd View Post
i saw a add " get 4500 for cfc and another 4500 from chrysler " thats 9k you get off a new chrysler . i dont think i would take 9k to drive one !
A Chrysler product wouldn't be my first choice either, but I'd drive just about anything to work as long as the a/c functioned.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 08-07-2009, 06:22 AM
ProdigyCustoms ProdigyCustoms is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,859
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

How fricken stupid. Never been so disappointed in our goverment. I guess I need to start thinking about Hot Rod Hybrids! Electric Pro Touring cars! UGH!
__________________
Frank Serafine
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net