...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Chassis and Suspension
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-24-2010, 08:52 PM
GM Muscle's Avatar
GM Muscle GM Muscle is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sherman, TX
Posts: 648
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default steering u-joint ?'s

I've got a small issue with my camaro and did a search but didnt yeild any black and white results.

I have a stock 69 column-non tilt, floor shift. Im using an IROC steering box and half height aluminum subframe bushings. I put a lsx in it with 1' set back mounts and hooker headers. the headers run close to the rag joint and i dont like the the idea of heat on rubber. on top of that the rag joint is already in a weird stretch/ bind from the raised subframe.

My question is, what U-joint can i/should i use? i would like to eliminate the rag joint all together. i am not a creature of comfort and i dont mind doing a little fab work if i have to.

Any part numbers or suggestions to help me surpass this obsticle?
__________________
'69 Camaro- Daily Driver
'70 Chevelle- Project
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-24-2010, 08:58 PM
speedjohnston speedjohnston is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 411
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Go to woodward steering and they have tons of universal combinations with weld on, bolt on, and all different splines. I just got another u-joint from them yesterday.
http://www.woodwardsteering.com/imag...l%20joints.pdf
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-24-2010, 10:07 PM
Roadbuster's Avatar
Roadbuster Roadbuster is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 72
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I used borgeson ujoints in my GTO. A isolating one on the steering box to a collapsable DD shaft and a regular Ujoint on the column.

Jon
__________________
Jon U.

1968 GTO - SC&C's suspension
1967 911 - a few modifications
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-24-2010, 11:52 PM
JRouche JRouche is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Ventura County
Posts: 253
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

My opinion is rag joints are not needed when you have proper U-joints in place. The rag joint serves double duty. For a small displacement of the steering shafts and for vibration reduction.

I decided to toss the rag joint in favor for some new U-joints and a vibration reducer from Borgeson. JR

http://www.borgeson.com/vibrationreducers.html
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-25-2010, 12:27 AM
Vegas69's Avatar
Vegas69 Vegas69 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,692
Thanks: 87
Thanked 215 Times in 120 Posts
Default

Rag joints are designed for factory applications where the steering shaft needs to get longer since they don't have solid body bushings. It also dampens as said. I'm sure you have solid body bushing so change over to a borgeson joint. I have solid motor mounts and body mounts and the steering is great with very little vibration.
__________________
Todd
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-25-2010, 07:22 AM
GM Muscle's Avatar
GM Muscle GM Muscle is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sherman, TX
Posts: 648
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for the help guys. Yes I'm all solid (motor and body). The steering box input shaft is pretty close the bottom of the column. I'm assuming the collar the rag joint bolted to on the column will come off the expose the splines?
__________________
'69 Camaro- Daily Driver
'70 Chevelle- Project
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net