...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Lateral-G Open Discussions > Open Discussion
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-11-2010, 01:38 PM
XcYZ's Avatar
XcYZ XcYZ is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Rochester, Minnesota
Posts: 8,998
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

As Chad noted, I don't think there's really that many LS conversions out there. At Car Craft last month, with 5,000+ cars, there were very, very few EFI conversions of any make.
__________________
Scott

My LS7 69 Camaro
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-11-2010, 03:39 PM
Josh69 Josh69 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 404
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by XcYZ View Post
As Chad noted, I don't think there's really that many LS conversions out there. At Car Craft last month, with 5,000+ cars, there were very, very few EFI conversions of any make.
Agreed, I could count them on my fingers.

Hindsight 20/20, I'd do an LSx. For what I've spent on a whopping 475hp in this old Poncho, I should have.
__________________
1969 Firebird, Black w/Parchment Arizen interior, 383 Pontiac Stroker (350/428 crank), TKO600, Moser 12 bolt, 18" TTII's, Hotchkis, GW, DSE, Speed Tech, Vintage A/C, etc.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-11-2010, 04:00 PM
Stuart Adams Stuart Adams is offline
Lateral-g Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,046
Thanks: 19
Thanked 62 Times in 38 Posts
Default

Alot of it is the fear of the unknown. Men are brand shoppers and don't stray too far away from what there used too. We go to the store get it and get out. Until you have tried other options its really hard to have a legitimate opinion, IMO. Conversion to LS isn't cheap either.

I don't hear people putting in LS motors and bitching they should have ran a big block!

Last edited by Stuart Adams; 08-11-2010 at 04:03 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-11-2010, 04:12 PM
FrankZ FrankZ is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: northern Illinois
Posts: 33
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

For me a gen1 works,Ihave too much time and $$ in it to swap out.However if I were starting from scratch (ie. no motor) I would go for the latest and greatest.I look at changes from the perspective of---What will I get for my dollar spent. Bling--NOT ,Results-GOT
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-11-2010, 04:12 PM
Vegas69's Avatar
Vegas69 Vegas69 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,692
Thanks: 87
Thanked 215 Times in 120 Posts
Default

There is no replacement for displacement....
__________________
Todd
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-11-2010, 04:17 PM
BBC71Nova BBC71Nova is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 849
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Default

I tend to agree with Todd. However, the LSx stuff now can be punched/stroked to go pretty large. The packaging still is beneficial too. A BBC can be built to shed some pounds with aluminum block too but they are just sooo expensive. Getting tougher and tougher to stay true to the big blocks .

John
__________________
John
'71 Nova (Build thread)
FFR Roadster
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-12-2010, 09:35 AM
Bow Tie 67's Avatar
Bow Tie 67 Bow Tie 67 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: NW burbs, IL
Posts: 525
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Old school is nice, but letting a computer control combustion, superior ground up design, longevity, MPG's, easy HP, light weight, great throttle response, self protection, ..........
__________________
Matt

Project: " Chain Reaction "

A.K.A. " BIG " by wife, biatch in garage.



1969 RS Camaro, L92 T56, Chassisworks sub, Quadra-Link, Bear, Ford 9".
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-12-2010, 01:22 PM
dubbleu's Avatar
dubbleu dubbleu is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 81
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Ive seen two LS powered 69 camaro's that were driven by the owners on the street for a year or so. Both cars ran great with awesome gas milage. They have both since been swaped out for the all aluminum 427ci GM crate motor. The reason I got from both owners was that the LS motors just didnt seem right in the car. They perfer the traditional rumble of the BBC.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-12-2010, 03:43 PM
Rhino Rhino is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Olathe, KS
Posts: 242
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bow Tie 67 View Post
Old school is nice, but letting a computer control combustion, superior ground up design, longevity, MPG's, easy HP, light weight, great throttle response, self protection, ..........
...and superior drivability. HP doesn't mean anything to me if it's a pain to maintain and drive.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-13-2010, 05:44 AM
Roadrage David Roadrage David is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 111
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bow Tie 67 View Post
Old school is nice, but letting a computer control combustion, superior ground up design, longevity, MPG's, easy HP, light weight, great throttle response, self protection, ..........
I hope you are aware that the LS7 disighn is a steal from GM between a mopar botom end end a ford top end engine disign.

And that that engine in modern corvettes. are alouwd to use 1 to 1 1/2 quart of oil every1500/2000 miles.

And that fuel injections only hase 2 benifits.nr one is that is gives MPG at 50/60 mph and afther that it uses just as mutchs fuel at trotle as a regualr old school V8 engine. nr 2 you dont need to tune your ignition/carb twice a year.

Did you know that the LS7 engine in race corvettes only last 35 hours. then need a compleet rebuild ,due to a engine disight fauld where the piston squirts are to short!!!!..

Im a oil sponser in a international super car race class in Europe
LS 7 corvettes, Moslers V8 stars against ferarris / lamborginies/ aston Martin /
marcos / BMW / Mercs. ecetera.
The LS engine hase superior acseleration for sure top speed is great to say the least.
durabilety is mutch less and maintinese is mutch higher then there euro counter parts.

Also the rediculess price tag on hp parts for the LS engine and the corvette that GM and there vendors in the afthermarket artifisialy keeps high to push the corvette into the same leque as ferrari ecetera is rediculess to say the least.

buy a stok LS7 with 500 hp then try to buy a 700 hp LS 7 engine from a reputable engine builder like Kteck ecetera and your paying a exstra 10 to 15000 usd!!!. what is wrong here.........

If we build a 700 hp aluminum traditional ponticac engine mill with the same 4 inch stroke it wil beat up on the LS 7 engine torque wize plus durabilety it wil rev just as high and fuel consumtion will be the same.
same thing with a SBC ore BBC for that matter.

also for the record the GM LS7 hase NOTHING to do with a traditional chevy engine disighn its a CORPERATED engine build. ITS NOT A CHEVY..

Last edited by Roadrage David; 08-13-2010 at 05:47 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net