...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Lateral-G Open Discussions > Project Updates
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-27-2010, 08:32 PM
Steve1968LS2's Avatar
Steve1968LS2 Steve1968LS2 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim Hills, CA
Posts: 5,534
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ANVIL1 View Post
The center caps are really cool! Evod made the wheels for the Anvil Mustang and they are works of art.
Sorry your not feeling well, Steve. I hope you fell well enough to do what you need to do at SEMA!
I will be fun.. just going out to have fun this year..

BTW.. your Mustang is f'ing off the hook sick.. tempted to put it in the Camaro magazine it's so nice!
__________________
"A ship in port is safe, but that's not what ships are built for."

See Bad Penny run the cones: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GUPPIX-92U

1971 Chevelle Wagon - Roadster Shop Chassis ProCharged Shafiroff LS and lots of yada yada

1968 Camaro - Project Track Rat - 440 RHS LS
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-27-2010, 08:43 PM
Steve1968LS2's Avatar
Steve1968LS2 Steve1968LS2 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim Hills, CA
Posts: 5,534
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
Default

And the obligatory video:

__________________
"A ship in port is safe, but that's not what ships are built for."

See Bad Penny run the cones: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GUPPIX-92U

1971 Chevelle Wagon - Roadster Shop Chassis ProCharged Shafiroff LS and lots of yada yada

1968 Camaro - Project Track Rat - 440 RHS LS
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-27-2010, 08:44 PM
cmraman's Avatar
cmraman cmraman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 522
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve1968LS2 View Post
I will be fun.. just going out to have fun this year..

BTW.. your Mustang is f'ing off the hook sick.. tempted to put it in the Camaro magazine it's so nice!

Back off Steve... I want it for PHR... LOL
__________________
Robert McGaffin
McGaffin Digital Photo
http://www.flickr.com/photos/rkmphot...7594214498126/
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-27-2010, 08:47 PM
Steve1968LS2's Avatar
Steve1968LS2 Steve1968LS2 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim Hills, CA
Posts: 5,534
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cmraman View Post
Back off Steve... I want it for PHR... LOL
lol.. ok, this time, but you owe me
__________________
"A ship in port is safe, but that's not what ships are built for."

See Bad Penny run the cones: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GUPPIX-92U

1971 Chevelle Wagon - Roadster Shop Chassis ProCharged Shafiroff LS and lots of yada yada

1968 Camaro - Project Track Rat - 440 RHS LS
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-27-2010, 09:10 PM
Vegas69's Avatar
Vegas69 Vegas69 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,692
Thanks: 87
Thanked 215 Times in 120 Posts
Default

And I thought I worked on my big block alot... I didn't know street cars ran on race gas. Looks like you got a little greedy. I know the feeling. That torque curve and engine is ridiculous. Compression and stroke are to blame, I noticed the hp fell off before 6000. I be that changes with less compression.
__________________
Todd
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-27-2010, 09:20 PM
Steve1968LS2's Avatar
Steve1968LS2 Steve1968LS2 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim Hills, CA
Posts: 5,534
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vegas69 View Post
And I thought I worked on my big block alot... I didn't know street cars ran on race gas. Looks like you got a little greedy. I know the feeling. That torque curve and engine is ridiculous. Compression and stroke are to blame, I noticed the hp fell off before 6000. I be that changes with less compression.
I didn't get greedy.. we just got surprised with a really thin head gasket from RHS. Hoped it would be fine with the overlap and that dynamic would be in a sweet spot. Oh well.

Could put in the bigger cam and drop dynamic, but I don't want the bigger cam. This is the first engine I've ever "designed" that came up needing more than 91 octane, but it happens.

The HP fell before 6000 instead of after (like on the engine dyno) because the 90mm TB is starving the engine of air at that level. The 102mm should help with that.

Only looking to drop it 4/10ths of a point.. we are just outside the 91 octane range. To be honest if I lived in a 93 octane state without all the crap additives we have here in CA I would most likely be fine. Here the next step from 91 is 100.. which sucks.

Anyways, just a temp problem that can be fixed.. for now I will enjoy the sweet smeels eminating from my tailpipes..
__________________
"A ship in port is safe, but that's not what ships are built for."

See Bad Penny run the cones: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GUPPIX-92U

1971 Chevelle Wagon - Roadster Shop Chassis ProCharged Shafiroff LS and lots of yada yada

1968 Camaro - Project Track Rat - 440 RHS LS
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-27-2010, 09:23 PM
NOPANTS68 NOPANTS68 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Orangevale CA
Posts: 916
Thanks: 2
Thanked 22 Times in 20 Posts
Default

Sounds so wicked Steve. Pretty amazing powerplant. Made me walk out to the garage and snicker at mine. lol
__________________
1929 Roadster Pickup
1961 Chevy Parkwood Wagon
1956 Chevy 210


Smithcraft Collision and Restoration
Newcastle , CA
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-01-2010, 08:36 AM
Blake Foster's Avatar
Blake Foster Blake Foster is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: St George Utah
Posts: 2,526
Thanks: 6
Thanked 101 Times in 44 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve1968LS2 View Post
I didn't get greedy.. we just got surprised with a really thin head gasket from RHS. Hoped it would be fine with the overlap and that dynamic would be in a sweet spot. Oh well.

Could put in the bigger cam and drop dynamic, but I don't want the bigger cam. This is the first engine I've ever "designed" that came up needing more than 91 octane, but it happens.

The HP fell before 6000 instead of after (like on the engine dyno) because the 90mm TB is starving the engine of air at that level. The 102mm should help with that.

Only looking to drop it 4/10ths of a point.. we are just outside the 91 octane range. To be honest if I lived in a 93 octane state without all the crap additives we have here in CA I would most likely be fine. Here the next step from 91 is 100.. which sucks.

Anyways, just a temp problem that can be fixed.. for now I will enjoy the sweet smeels eminating from my tailpipes..
Now see there would be ONE reason to move to Canada, we have 94 octane at the pump. and its only 5.20 a gallon. the 5.20 a gallon part is a good reason not to

i brought 15 gallons with me
__________________
Blake Foster
www.speedtechperformance.com
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-01-2010, 12:15 PM
Ron in SoCal's Avatar
Ron in SoCal Ron in SoCal is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 5,044
Thanks: 6
Thanked 9 Times in 6 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by killer69 View Post
Now see there would be ONE reason to move to Canada, we have 94 octane at the pump. and its only 5.20 a gallon. the 5.20 a gallon part is a good reason not to

i brought 15 gallons with me
Blake you can get 100 octane all over Vegas if you want/need it. It''s about $6 a gal, tho...
__________________
Ron in SoCal
69 Camaro in progress
https://lateral-g.net/forums/showthread.php4?t=31246

Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-01-2010, 06:51 PM
TimeWarpF100 TimeWarpF100 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Phoenix AZ
Posts: 227
Thanks: 41
Thanked 44 Times in 26 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve1968LS2 View Post
I didn't get greedy.. we just got surprised with a really thin head gasket from RHS. Hoped it would be fine with the overlap and that dynamic would be in a sweet spot. Oh well.

Could put in the bigger cam and drop dynamic, but I don't want the bigger cam. This is the first engine I've ever "designed" that came up needing more than 91 octane, but it happens.

The HP fell before 6000 instead of after (like on the engine dyno) because the 90mm TB is starving the engine of air at that level. The 102mm should help with that.

Only looking to drop it 4/10ths of a point.. we are just outside the 91 octane range. To be honest if I lived in a 93 octane state without all the crap additives we have here in CA I would most likely be fine. Here the next step from 91 is 100.. which sucks.

Anyways, just a temp problem that can be fixed.. for now I will enjoy the sweet smeels eminating from my tailpipes..
Awesome, Awesome car Steve!

Is your Dynamic around 8.75? Estimated it by looking at your specs..

Intake closing is?

The magic number for 91 octane is what under 8.25?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net