...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Lateral-G Open Discussions > Project Updates
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-25-2011, 04:41 PM
Rybar's Avatar
Rybar Rybar is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Burnaby, BC, Canada
Posts: 3,190
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Guys, so Bill ended up installing a shorter spring. Car is sitting alot lower now and the only problem he can see is the top of the diff pumpkin hitting the trunk floor as I have about 1.5" of travel. The new springs are 200 lb.

Sorry for the crappy pic:



Franky, the noise ended up being the shifter hitting the trans tunnel shifter hole opening. Bill clearanced it a bit and now the mystery noise is gone.
__________________
1969 CAMARO RS
HKE 383 LS1-T56 Dyno results: 496 rwhp 469 rwtq
Lateral-G Feature Page
Project pics of my '69
Camaro Performers Magazine Feature
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-25-2011, 04:54 PM
Sieg's Avatar
Sieg Sieg is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Pacific Northwet
Posts: 8,034
Thanks: 33
Thanked 99 Times in 41 Posts
Default

1.5" sounds minimal, how much travel does a DSE Quad or AME 3 Link have?

The car looks like it could be .25-.5" low now, full tank of fuel in the pic?

If you're going to track day the car, bottoming under hard corner loads could create traction/control issues at inopportune times.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-25-2011, 05:20 PM
Rybar's Avatar
Rybar Rybar is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Burnaby, BC, Canada
Posts: 3,190
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Yeah, will have to see it in person and may raise it up now. Too high, too low lol I've got issues
__________________
1969 CAMARO RS
HKE 383 LS1-T56 Dyno results: 496 rwhp 469 rwtq
Lateral-G Feature Page
Project pics of my '69
Camaro Performers Magazine Feature
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-25-2011, 06:03 PM
Sieg's Avatar
Sieg Sieg is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Pacific Northwet
Posts: 8,034
Thanks: 33
Thanked 99 Times in 41 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rybar View Post
Yeah, will have to see it in person and may raise it up now. Too high, too low lol I've got issues
Patience, you know what you want. You'll get there, the secret in times like this is not making short-term compromises that you'll regret in the future.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-25-2011, 06:27 PM
JKnight JKnight is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 747
Thanks: 10
Thanked 67 Times in 40 Posts
Default

Given that you have the G-link you should be able to raise the lower shock mounting to get the ride height where you want it since there are a few holes available to you.

I think it looked good before, but then again, my car sits high in the rear so what do I know...When I installed the hyperco springs from Tyler's 68 (which sat too high in his car) mine looked like it had a dump in its pants.
__________________
Jeff: Project "Rolling Mockup" 69 Camaro SS, AFX, TKO600, Baer GT, etc
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-25-2011, 06:32 PM
tones2SS's Avatar
tones2SS tones2SS is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 8,176
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rybar View Post
Yeah, will have to see it in person and may raise it up now. Too high, too low lol I've got issues
Don't feel bad, I'd be the EXACT same way. Gotta get the stance right.
Good luck Ryan.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-25-2011, 06:46 PM
Rybar's Avatar
Rybar Rybar is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Burnaby, BC, Canada
Posts: 3,190
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JKnight View Post
Given that you have the G-link you should be able to raise the lower shock mounting to get the ride height where you want it since there are a few holes available to you.

I think it looked good before, but then again, my car sits high in the rear so what do I know...When I installed the hyperco springs from Tyler's 68 (which sat too high in his car) mine looked like it had a dump in its pants.
Jeff, Bill said the shocks were bolted in the lowest positions before, now with the shorter spring he moved thier mounting positions up.

Quote:
Originally Posted by tones2SS View Post
Don't feel bad, I'd be the EXACT same way. Gotta get the stance right.
Good luck Ryan.
Tones, I don't feel bad at all. Stance is very important to me as stupid as it sounds. I did the same with my leafs. They were adjusted a few times before we got them "right"
__________________
1969 CAMARO RS
HKE 383 LS1-T56 Dyno results: 496 rwhp 469 rwtq
Lateral-G Feature Page
Project pics of my '69
Camaro Performers Magazine Feature
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-25-2011, 11:09 PM
awr68's Avatar
awr68 awr68 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Oregon
Posts: 6,478
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default

Ryan it's looking great!
You shouldn't have a hard time with the stance...just show Bill a pic of Red Devil w/ the Fikse's on it and tell him to make your car sit like Mark's....
__________________
Tony
'68 Camaro
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-25-2011, 11:10 PM
Vegas69's Avatar
Vegas69 Vegas69 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,692
Thanks: 87
Thanked 215 Times in 120 Posts
Default

You're going to need around 2.25-2.5" of bump. That would've been the benefit of raising the shock mount, more bump travel at a lower ride height. However, your pinion housing will hit the tunnel before the pumpkin hits the trunk. My car is 24.75 to the crease on the quarter. I can lower mine to around 24.5 but I'd rather have a little extra to play with on the race track. 24.75 gives me 2.5 inches of bump travel and the pinion is about a pinky away from the tunnel at full compression. I'd start at 2" of shock travel and keep an eye on the o rings.
__________________
Todd
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-26-2011, 02:16 PM
Rybar's Avatar
Rybar Rybar is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Burnaby, BC, Canada
Posts: 3,190
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by awr68 View Post
Ryan it's looking great!
You shouldn't have a hard time with the stance...just show Bill a pic of Red Devil w/ the Fikse's on it and tell him to make your car sit like Mark's....
Thanks Anthony, well that's what I tried to do. Unfortunately it's not as simple as that since the G-link doesn't have the clearance to go super low without running into this problem. Bill's going to test drive the car today and see how it is at the current height, if there's an issue he will raise it back up.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vegas69 View Post
You're going to need around 2.25-2.5" of bump. That would've been the benefit of raising the shock mount, more bump travel at a lower ride height. However, your pinion housing will hit the tunnel before the pumpkin hits the trunk. My car is 24.75 to the crease on the quarter. I can lower mine to around 24.5 but I'd rather have a little extra to play with on the race track. 24.75 gives me 2.5 inches of bump travel and the pinion is about a pinky away from the tunnel at full compression. I'd start at 2" of shock travel and keep an eye on the o rings.
Thanks for the measurments Todd, I'll check the numbers once I get it back which should be today.
__________________
1969 CAMARO RS
HKE 383 LS1-T56 Dyno results: 496 rwhp 469 rwtq
Lateral-G Feature Page
Project pics of my '69
Camaro Performers Magazine Feature
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net