...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Chassis and Suspension
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-17-2011, 09:30 AM
wmhjr wmhjr is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 222
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

There's your problem. Factory specs are worthless once you've changed geometry using different spindles, ball joints, upper and lower control arms. You've changed your entire front geometry and need to align accounting for it.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-17-2011, 09:42 AM
Proforged Proforged is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 12
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wmhjr View Post
There's your problem. Factory specs are worthless once you've changed geometry using different spindles, ball joints, upper and lower control arms. You've changed your entire front geometry and need to align accounting for it.
Since he hasn't changed his spindles or ball joints, the front end geometry is the same as stock.

At the minimum, I would recommend replacing all of your control arm bushings, the idler arm, pitman arm, tie rod ends, and center link. Tall Upper and Lower Ball Joints will allow you to run a more aggressive alignment, but you will likely need tubular upper control arms to get the positive caster you need for highway handling.

If you install tubular upper control arms and tall upper and lower ball joints, here are some alignment specs you can use:

Camber: -1/2 degree
Caster: +5 to 5.5 degrees
Toe: 1/16" total toe-in

If you can't swing the above components right now, bring your car back to get it aligned as close to these specs as possible in the meantime. Dialing in the camber and adding positive caster will help your handling situation some.

Last edited by Proforged; 08-17-2011 at 10:21 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-17-2011, 09:48 AM
JKnight JKnight is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 749
Thanks: 10
Thanked 69 Times in 42 Posts
Default

He hasn't changed any suspension components yet, including bushings. I would suggest replacing all your bushings and whatever suspension pieces you are looking to do, have Les Schwab do a more aggressive alignment, then evaluate the handling of the car. 40 year old bushings are going to make that car do all kinds of crazy things going down the road.

Also, why are you running only 28 psi?
__________________
Jeff: Project "Rolling Mockup" 69 Camaro SS, AFX, TKO600, Baer GT, etc
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-17-2011, 11:03 AM
wmhjr wmhjr is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 222
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

He changed to 2" lowering springs. Geometry is changed.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-17-2011, 12:26 PM
GregWeld's Avatar
GregWeld GregWeld is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Scottsdale, AriDzona
Posts: 20,741
Thanks: 504
Thanked 1,080 Times in 388 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Proforged View Post
Since he hasn't changed his spindles or ball joints, the front end geometry is the same as stock.

At the minimum, I would recommend replacing all of your control arm bushings, the idler arm, pitman arm, tie rod ends, and center link. Tall Upper and Lower Ball Joints will allow you to run a more aggressive alignment, but you will likely need tubular upper control arms to get the positive caster you need for highway handling.

If you install tubular upper control arms and tall upper and lower ball joints, here are some alignment specs you can use:

Camber: -1/2 degree
Caster: +5 to 5.5 degrees
Toe: 1/16" total toe-in

If you can't swing the above components right now, bring your car back to get it aligned as close to these specs as possible in the meantime. Dialing in the camber and adding positive caster will help your handling situation some.

REALLY? New control arms per his post... and lowering springs... and you're saying nothing changed...

His first mistake was taking it to Les Schwab and not discussing these changes - and the second mistake was the tech not recognizing the changes and accounting for them.

Further - my guess is the steering box is "loose"... and the bushings are old etc. BUT the tech should have discussed all of that with him (and maybe did).

"Hunting rabbits" on the road is no fun - and can be downright dangerous when the roads get wet/slick. I say take it back to Les Schwab - and ask for a tech that understand suspensions not just how to read specs from a book.

Hope it gets better for you!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-17-2011, 01:03 PM
JKnight JKnight is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 749
Thanks: 10
Thanked 69 Times in 42 Posts
Default

I think to this point he's just done the lowering springs. Control arms are on his list of what he'd like to do, but hasn't yet.

I would think worn out bushings throughout the front suspension and the worn steering box Greg mentioned would contribute more to the wandering he's experiencing while trying to go straight down the highway than the springs would.
__________________
Jeff: Project "Rolling Mockup" 69 Camaro SS, AFX, TKO600, Baer GT, etc
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-17-2011, 01:09 PM
wmhjr wmhjr is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 222
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I read the op as the car was ok on the highway, but after lowering and big wheels and low profile tires it got much worse.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-17-2011, 01:19 PM
JKnight JKnight is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 749
Thanks: 10
Thanked 69 Times in 42 Posts
Default

Hahaha, this thread is like the telephone game.

Bottom line is we're all pissing into the wind trying to guess until we get more clear and detailed information.

I would believe that the wider tires and stiffer sidewalls would expose the weaknesses in the suspension bushings and tolerances that caused the wandering and darting. With tall profile skinny tires I can believe that these weaknesses might have been masked to some degree.
__________________
Jeff: Project "Rolling Mockup" 69 Camaro SS, AFX, TKO600, Baer GT, etc

Last edited by JKnight; 08-17-2011 at 01:22 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-17-2011, 01:50 PM
GregWeld's Avatar
GregWeld GregWeld is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Scottsdale, AriDzona
Posts: 20,741
Thanks: 504
Thanked 1,080 Times in 388 Posts
Default

Sorry - Yes you're right -- I misread the lower control arms - he changed in the REAR.... Not the front. The ADD got me...

Either way -- he needs to go back and have a good honest discussion with the TECH....
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:11 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net