...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Wheels and Tires
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-08-2014, 07:48 PM
6carmello8 6carmello8 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 81
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Musclerodz View Post
Wider is always better. If your running 335 out back it will have less of a push (under steer) in the corners.
Makes sense and more balanced feel I assume. Thanks!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Formula43 Wheel View Post
A 275 on a 9.5-10.0" wide wheel is a good fit. More front end grip and more fun! It should still drive nice down the freeway without much tramlining in the ruts.

I'm thinking more on the 9.5 wheel for the street with the 275's. What do you think? It'll be negligible but less wheel = less unsprung weight, and the tire will have less "stretch" if any and more "squish" on the tire. What backspace would be ideal? Ridetech recommends 18x10 with 5.75" offset so with a 18x9.5 a 5.5"?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-08-2014, 08:02 PM
Track Junky's Avatar
Track Junky Track Junky is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,469
Thanks: 2
Thanked 12 Times in 7 Posts
Default

275's on 9.5's works well.
__________________
Gaetano Cosentino
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-08-2014, 11:17 PM
Vince@Meanstreets's Avatar
Vince@Meanstreets Vince@Meanstreets is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 5,532
Thanks: 13
Thanked 18 Times in 12 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 6carmello8 View Post
Makes sense and more balanced feel I assume. Thanks!



I'm thinking more on the 9.5 wheel for the street with the 275's. What do you think? It'll be negligible but less wheel = less unsprung weight, and the tire will have less "stretch" if any and more "squish" on the tire. What backspace would be ideal? Ridetech recommends 18x10 with 5.75" offset so with a 18x9.5 a 5.5"?
Its a 68? I'd stay with the 9.5's with 5.750in BS. You can do 10's with a 6" BS but you have to do some work.
__________________
MEANSTREETS PERFORMANCE

Dealer for
ACCUAIR rideheight control systems
ENTROPY RADIATORS XXX radiators for your pro-touring vehicle
FORGELINE MOTORSPORTS Highline custom 3 piece wheels
WEGNER AUTOMOTIVE Custom engines and LSX drive systems
SPEEDTECH PERFORMANCE Bay Area stocking dealer

NEVER FORGET -11
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-09-2014, 05:13 PM
6carmello8 6carmello8 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 81
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vince@MSperfab View Post
Its a 68? I'd stay with the 9.5's with 5.750in BS. You can do 10's with a 6" BS but you have to do some work.
Yes it's a 68 and Ridetech also recommends a 5.75 BS with a 10 so same bs with a 9.5 will give me a bit more room lock to lock on the subframe. Thanks for the info.

Anyone with experiences going from a 255 up front to a 275 as far as performance?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-09-2014, 05:22 PM
Track Junky's Avatar
Track Junky Track Junky is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,469
Thanks: 2
Thanked 12 Times in 7 Posts
Default

Tough one to answer in my opinion. 275 is only a 1/2" wider. Other factors that contribute to performance are tire weight and load capacity.
I ran 255's on the road course for quite awhile before going to 275's and at this time I honestly couldn't tell you if I felt a difference.

Note: that was with 275's out back.
__________________
Gaetano Cosentino
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-09-2014, 05:46 PM
Formula43 Wheel's Avatar
Formula43 Wheel Formula43 Wheel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 349
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 6carmello8 View Post
Makes sense and more balanced feel I assume. Thanks!



I'm thinking more on the 9.5 wheel for the street with the 275's. What do you think? It'll be negligible but less wheel = less unsprung weight, and the tire will have less "stretch" if any and more "squish" on the tire. What backspace would be ideal? Ridetech recommends 18x10 with 5.75" offset so with a 18x9.5 a 5.5"?
The wheel weight difference between a 9.5" and a 10.0" wide wheel is minimal. The Rival, Michelin Pilot Sport, Toyo R888 and Bridgestone's run wide and fit best on a 10.0" wide wheel. Check out the tire specifications chart and match the tread width to the wheel width for optimum tire performance.

Stielow's last two Camaro's ran a 10.0X18 front with a 275/35-18 tire and both cars won Optima.

I'm not savvy on Ride Tech's recommend wheel fitments. I've contact them several times and asked, but they stated they do not want to be responsible for wheel/tire fitments that may or may not fit.

Anyone familiar with the RideTech's suspension set up's and wheel/tire fitments?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-10-2014, 03:53 PM
6carmello8 6carmello8 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 81
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Track Junky View Post
Tough one to answer in my opinion. 275 is only a 1/2" wider. Other factors that contribute to performance are tire weight and load capacity.
I ran 255's on the road course for quite awhile before going to 275's and at this time I honestly couldn't tell you if I felt a difference.

Note: that was with 275's out back.
Hummn that's interesting. I think though with a 325 out back, the 275 with balance it out more...less understeer. What engine did you have up front?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Formula43 Wheel View Post
The wheel weight difference between a 9.5" and a 10.0" wide wheel is minimal. The Rival, Michelin Pilot Sport, Toyo R888 and Bridgestone's run wide and fit best on a 10.0" wide wheel. Check out the tire specifications chart and match the tread width to the wheel width for optimum tire performance.

Stielow's last two Camaro's ran a 10.0X18 front with a 275/35-18 tire and both cars won Optima.

I'm not savvy on Ride Tech's recommend wheel fitments. I've contact them several times and asked, but they stated they do not want to be responsible for wheel/tire fitments that may or may not fit.

Anyone familiar with the RideTech's suspension set up's and wheel/tire fitments?
Thanks for the info on the tire width sizes, this will help to chose what tires to run and if I do end up going with a 9.5 or 10 up front.

When you say they run wide, is this simply from a fitment perspective? I noticed that Pzero's have a square sidewall but say the BFG's G force have a flaring area by the rim that make them seem wider but the contact points on all the tires may be the same or do they in fact have wider contact points?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-10-2014, 05:38 PM
Track Junky's Avatar
Track Junky Track Junky is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,469
Thanks: 2
Thanked 12 Times in 7 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 6carmello8 View Post
Hummn that's interesting. I think though with a 325 out back, the 275 with balance it out more...less understeer. What engine did you have up front?
At the time I was running an iron block 383. Currently running an aluminum small block 427 now with 275's up front and 315's in the rear.

True statement but performance wise you'll have to spend some time making the 325's work with the 275's up front. Not optimal but not a big deal around here either. That's part of the fun......learning suspension geometry.
__________________
Gaetano Cosentino
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-11-2014, 04:03 PM
6carmello8 6carmello8 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 81
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Track Junky View Post
At the time I was running an iron block 383. Currently running an aluminum small block 427 now with 275's up front and 315's in the rear.

True statement but performance wise you'll have to spend some time making the 325's work with the 275's up front. Not optimal but not a big deal around here either. That's part of the fun......learning suspension geometry.
Did you notice a difference with the aluminum block vs. aluminum as far as overall handling? 275/325 is what the Z06's are running...I don't see why it would be a problem especially on the street.

Last edited by 6carmello8; 04-11-2014 at 04:15 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-11-2014, 05:07 PM
Track Junky's Avatar
Track Junky Track Junky is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,469
Thanks: 2
Thanked 12 Times in 7 Posts
Default

Im not really qualified enough to give you an educated answer but my guess would be the rear tires need to be wider on the Vettes because of the higher tread rating and the amount of power they are putting to the rear wheels.

Weight loss makes a huge improvement.
__________________
Gaetano Cosentino
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net