...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Lateral-G Open Discussions > Project Updates
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #101  
Old 01-24-2011, 09:30 PM
Rybar's Avatar
Rybar Rybar is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Burnaby, BC, Canada
Posts: 3,190
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HotRod68Camaro View Post
If the linkage bar geometry would bind by going to a shorter shock/spring wouldn't it still bind by raising the upper mount? I'm interested to see how this plays out b/c i was actually going to order my g-link today until i saw your update.
In theory that does sound right Kyle, I'm leaving this to Bill at the shop to figure out.
__________________
1969 CAMARO RS
HKE 383 LS1-T56 Dyno results: 496 rwhp 469 rwtq
Lateral-G Feature Page
Project pics of my '69
Camaro Performers Magazine Feature
Reply With Quote
  #102  
Old 01-24-2011, 09:50 PM
bigtime's Avatar
bigtime bigtime is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South East, PA
Posts: 65
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

If its a unequal 4 link with spherical rod ends what exactly is binding? If you removed the springs the car should sit right on the top of the shock, can it?

I'm really curious also as I have one on the floor waiting for my car to come back from the bodyshop.

By the way, sweet car!
Reply With Quote
  #103  
Old 01-25-2011, 12:28 AM
Tom.A's Avatar
Tom.A Tom.A is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: So-Cal.
Posts: 950
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Those wheels take the car to another level. Looks great
__________________
Tom
Reply With Quote
  #104  
Old 01-25-2011, 10:24 AM
frankv11's Avatar
frankv11 frankv11 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: socal
Posts: 963
Thanks: 0
Thanked 28 Times in 17 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rybar View Post
So the other updates I have going on are some on-going minor problems. The car has been making a rattling noise under acceleration for a little while. I had a buddy go through the car trying to figure it out. He ended up doing the following:

- Installed solid motor mounts. (for some reason my car has trashed 2 sets of poly mounts)
- New poly trans mount
- Fixed some wiring and gauges
- checked the entire exhaust for leaks and tightened everything up
- new header gaskets
- installed a new GM t-stat and did a coolant flush.

While he had the car, he had a tranny shop listen to the noise, well the owner convinced him it was the tranny for sure. So he ended up pulling the Tranny and we had it rebuilt with the Stage II kit from The Gearbox Co: 600-650 hp capacity

http://www.thegearbox.org/catalog/it...17/7824166.htm



Once the Tranny was pulled apart it ended up needed new 5th, 6th and reverse gears and sychros.

I also ended up going with a brand new Spec Stage 3+ Clutch. 900+ ft lbs capacity

All in all, cost me about $2k to rebuild the tranny and clutch. But it now feels very solid, the new clutch engages really nice but the damn noise still persists.
older subject but the noise you speak off, is that a rattling sound out of the t56 shifter, because I get some noise out of my shifter and if the knob is a bit loose it really starts to rattle.
for me I also suspect the clutch may be slipping under accelaration because I get the noise on 5th or 6th gear when I punch it..
Im also running a spec clutch everytime I let off the clutch I get an anoying long squeak during engagement and during down shift. spoke to the spec clutch people at the sema booth they insisted it was normal and they call it a bark ( noise ) ,it started doing it more as the clucth broke in.

well I tell you what Ill never use spec again. I dont want my clutch to bark, it feels like im driving a clunker. the noise is loud and embarrasing ,
just wondering if it may be same noise

by the way those rear tires look sick I love that foot print , this is the first time I see them, sorry to hear about your stance Im sure youll get it right
Reply With Quote
  #105  
Old 01-25-2011, 04:41 PM
Rybar's Avatar
Rybar Rybar is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Burnaby, BC, Canada
Posts: 3,190
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Guys, so Bill ended up installing a shorter spring. Car is sitting alot lower now and the only problem he can see is the top of the diff pumpkin hitting the trunk floor as I have about 1.5" of travel. The new springs are 200 lb.

Sorry for the crappy pic:



Franky, the noise ended up being the shifter hitting the trans tunnel shifter hole opening. Bill clearanced it a bit and now the mystery noise is gone.
__________________
1969 CAMARO RS
HKE 383 LS1-T56 Dyno results: 496 rwhp 469 rwtq
Lateral-G Feature Page
Project pics of my '69
Camaro Performers Magazine Feature
Reply With Quote
  #106  
Old 01-25-2011, 04:54 PM
Sieg's Avatar
Sieg Sieg is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Pacific Northwet
Posts: 8,034
Thanks: 33
Thanked 99 Times in 41 Posts
Default

1.5" sounds minimal, how much travel does a DSE Quad or AME 3 Link have?

The car looks like it could be .25-.5" low now, full tank of fuel in the pic?

If you're going to track day the car, bottoming under hard corner loads could create traction/control issues at inopportune times.
Reply With Quote
  #107  
Old 01-25-2011, 05:20 PM
Rybar's Avatar
Rybar Rybar is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Burnaby, BC, Canada
Posts: 3,190
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Yeah, will have to see it in person and may raise it up now. Too high, too low lol I've got issues
__________________
1969 CAMARO RS
HKE 383 LS1-T56 Dyno results: 496 rwhp 469 rwtq
Lateral-G Feature Page
Project pics of my '69
Camaro Performers Magazine Feature
Reply With Quote
  #108  
Old 01-25-2011, 06:03 PM
Sieg's Avatar
Sieg Sieg is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Pacific Northwet
Posts: 8,034
Thanks: 33
Thanked 99 Times in 41 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rybar View Post
Yeah, will have to see it in person and may raise it up now. Too high, too low lol I've got issues
Patience, you know what you want. You'll get there, the secret in times like this is not making short-term compromises that you'll regret in the future.
Reply With Quote
  #109  
Old 01-25-2011, 06:27 PM
JKnight JKnight is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 747
Thanks: 10
Thanked 67 Times in 40 Posts
Default

Given that you have the G-link you should be able to raise the lower shock mounting to get the ride height where you want it since there are a few holes available to you.

I think it looked good before, but then again, my car sits high in the rear so what do I know...When I installed the hyperco springs from Tyler's 68 (which sat too high in his car) mine looked like it had a dump in its pants.
__________________
Jeff: Project "Rolling Mockup" 69 Camaro SS, AFX, TKO600, Baer GT, etc
Reply With Quote
  #110  
Old 01-25-2011, 06:32 PM
tones2SS's Avatar
tones2SS tones2SS is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 8,176
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rybar View Post
Yeah, will have to see it in person and may raise it up now. Too high, too low lol I've got issues
Don't feel bad, I'd be the EXACT same way. Gotta get the stance right.
Good luck Ryan.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net