...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Engine
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-13-2007, 07:51 AM
akrapovic's Avatar
akrapovic akrapovic is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: The glove
Posts: 313
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Default 3 inch or 2.5 inch exhaust

I've received conflicting advice. I have a 396/402 BB, I've been told 3 inch is the only way to go for a BB. Others have said 2.5 in for correct back pressure.

Thanks in advance.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-13-2007, 08:08 AM
XcYZ's Avatar
XcYZ XcYZ is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Rochester, Minnesota
Posts: 8,998
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

For performance, 3" without a doubt.
__________________
Scott

My LS7 69 Camaro
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-13-2007, 11:40 AM
70gotboost's Avatar
70gotboost 70gotboost is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Mooresville, N.C.
Posts: 170
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I was "told"... more than 383 ci, go with 3". Or ANYTHING supercharged/turbocharged needs 3".
__________________
70gotboost
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-13-2007, 12:17 PM
jski67's Avatar
jski67 jski67 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 124
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I've also read that 3 inch to the mufflers with 2.5 tailpipes is fine.

Supposedly, flow isn't affected much by the smaller pipe after the mufflers and 2.5 is a lot easier to bend and package.

I've got a tri 4-bar in my car, so I may go this route...

Jason
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-07-2007, 05:43 PM
rocketman's Avatar
rocketman rocketman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: mo
Posts: 718
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Manderal bent is the only way to go, If it's less than say 450 hp 2.5 will be fine. over that I prefer 3 inch
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-08-2007, 07:12 AM
COYBILT's Avatar
COYBILT COYBILT is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: modesto,ca
Posts: 646
Thanks: 1
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Depends on how pumped the motor is. If stock I would go with 2.5 inch or even a mild motor. If the thing has a large duration cam, good set of heads and header go with 3 inch.
__________________
1965 GTO convertible
2009 GM Design Award winner
Triple black with Subtle yet massive Modifications.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-13-2007, 05:31 PM
SteveMcqueenRules's Avatar
SteveMcqueenRules SteveMcqueenRules is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 142
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

check out the latest issue of car craft there is a great article on this very topic with dyno testing proof.
__________________
You're gonna be hangin' on for mercy when I get this sucker rollin'- FALFA
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-19-2007, 11:09 AM
6D9 6D9 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: stockton,ca
Posts: 693
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Car Craft just did an article on 2.5" vs 3.0" exhaust this month. The motor was a 500HP 383 Chevy. Both systems were Flowmaster mandrel bent with Super 44 muffs. Peak for peak there was only a 3HP difference between the two systems. But in the mid range there was a 10hp/10tq gain at a few rpm points. So it at that power level if you have a really low car or dont want a bunch of noise the 2.5" mandrel system with high flow muffs can work really well.


Dang...you must of typed that right before me!
__________________
69 Camaro
491 BBC
TH400/GV OD
Currie 9"
Rushforth Livewires
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-19-2007, 06:06 PM
HILROD's Avatar
HILROD HILROD is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 12
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

My Camaro has a 3in X pipe into 2.5 mufflers and tailpipes. This is with a supercharged 355. I've had fitment problems in the past, worse when mini-tubbed, with 3 inch tailpipes. I did a lot of searching before I bought anything. I think this is the best compromise. I don't think it gives up any noticible power. It's also quieter than full 3 inch systems. When I'm in boost that's a good thing.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-19-2007, 06:45 PM
Bad94 Bad94 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Cincinnati Ohio
Posts: 362
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I would do 3"


Quote:
Originally Posted by 70gotboost
I was "told"... more than 383 ci, go with 3". Or ANYTHING supercharged/turbocharged needs 3".
LOL, we have 3.5" on a turbo V6. from turbo to rear bumper
__________________
Above Average Motorsports
1972 Nova, Ride Tech, Forgelines, Wilwood, Bowler Transmission, Lingenfelter, RAFT.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net