...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Chassis and Suspension
User Name
Password



View Poll Results: Which one would you choose and why?
Alterkation front with Lateral Dynamics rear (does not use panhard bar) 12 60.00%
XV Level II front with XV Level II rear (does use panhard bar) 8 40.00%
Voters: 20. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-08-2007, 12:08 PM
JohnC JohnC is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 435
Thanks: 7
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Exclamation XV Motorsports vs. Lateral Dynamics

Any opinions? Thank you very much for all of your replies in advance....please.

JohnC
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-08-2007, 02:13 PM
Steve1968LS2's Avatar
Steve1968LS2 Steve1968LS2 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim Hills, CA
Posts: 5,534
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnC
Any opinions? Thank you very much for all of your replies in advance....please.

JohnC
I haven't installed the XV deal, but I have the lateral-dynamics set-up and I love it. Installation wasn't that bad either.

PM Bill Howell on the XV stuff, I know he's in the process of installing it on his Charger and should be able to give you insight.

Watt's links rule!!! lol
__________________
"A ship in port is safe, but that's not what ships are built for."

See Bad Penny run the cones: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GUPPIX-92U

1971 Chevelle Wagon - Roadster Shop Chassis ProCharged Shafiroff LS and lots of yada yada

1968 Camaro - Project Track Rat - 440 RHS LS
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-08-2007, 04:01 PM
deuce_454's Avatar
deuce_454 deuce_454 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 1,612
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

if you intend to turn both left and right... id vote for a watts-link.. but not having seen any of the two setups in person ill refrain from voting...
__________________
Elwood:We're 105 miles from Chicago, we have a full tank of gas, half pack of cigarettes, it's dark out and we're wearing sunglasses.
Jake: Hit it.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-08-2007, 04:22 PM
markss28 markss28 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: TX.
Posts: 561
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

My opinion will be based on price only. If your car will be just a cruiser and not actually at the track atleast 4 times a year. In other words it is a show only car. I would still like to see some of the high dollar ($100K+) run at the track 1/4 mile or road course.
__________________
Never Stay Stock
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-08-2007, 06:17 PM
JohnC JohnC is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 435
Thanks: 7
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by markss28
My opinion will be based on price only. If your car will be just a cruiser and not actually at the track atleast 4 times a year. In other words it is a show only car. I would still like to see some of the high dollar ($100K+) run at the track 1/4 mile or road course.
What did you vote for, Mark?...I don't want just a show car. If I did, these would not be the only two choices. I think both are very capable...just not sure which is the better suspension...which would win if it were in comparo test..like a protouring magazine or something.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-08-2007, 06:55 PM
Steve1968LS2's Avatar
Steve1968LS2 Steve1968LS2 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim Hills, CA
Posts: 5,534
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnC
What did you vote for, Mark?...I don't want just a show car. If I did, these would not be the only two choices. I think both are very capable...just not sure which is the better suspension...which would win if it were in comparo test..like a protouring magazine or something.
There are SO MANY other factors involved.. tires, driver, tuning, etc.. Hard to make a direct comparison.

But, I don't think there's much argument over the fact that a Watt's link is superior to a PHR set-up on the track (assuming you're turning in both directions.. lol)

For a street car the difference may not amount to enough to notice. My LD system certainly is tunable.
__________________
"A ship in port is safe, but that's not what ships are built for."

See Bad Penny run the cones: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GUPPIX-92U

1971 Chevelle Wagon - Roadster Shop Chassis ProCharged Shafiroff LS and lots of yada yada

1968 Camaro - Project Track Rat - 440 RHS LS
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-08-2007, 08:39 PM
Bill Howell Bill Howell is offline
Site Sponsor
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Pigeon Forge, Tn.
Posts: 967
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnC
Any opinions? Thank you very much for all of your replies in advance....please.

JohnC
What kind of car are you working on? No doubt I would use the XV over the AlterKation, since I bought the XV level II stuff. I should be able to give you a real world opinion in about two months on how the parts work on my charger.

Rear end I can not say, Mark did not have those parts available when I was buying parts for my car, so I don't know about the rear set up. I am working on putting the XV set up under my car at this time. So far I like what I see.
__________________
Bill Howell
www.americanstreetcarseries.com

Last edited by Bill Howell; 11-08-2007 at 08:49 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-08-2007, 08:44 PM
Silver69Camaro Silver69Camaro is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Auburn, WA
Posts: 270
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by deuce_454
if you intend to turn both left and right... id vote for a watts-link..
I differ from this opinion. A well-designed panhard bar can work extremely well, and does not suffer from the usual drawbacks of a watts (complexity, cost, weight, and exhaust room).
__________________
Matt Jones
Mechanical Engineer
Art Morrison Enterprises
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-08-2007, 09:23 PM
JohnC JohnC is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 435
Thanks: 7
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Howell
What kind of car are you working on? No doubt I would use the XV over the AlterKation, since I bought the XV level II stuff. I should be able to give you a real world opinion in about two months on how the parts work on my charger.

Rear end I can not say, Mark did not have those parts available when I was buying parts for my car, so I don't know about the rear set up. I am working on putting the XV set up under my car at this time. So far I like what I see.
I'm building a '71 cuda... those are the two options I've narrowed it down to. Just wondering which would perform better...since lateral dynamics doesn't yet have a front suspension I choose the AlterK to go with it for know.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-09-2007, 01:55 AM
Bowtieracing Bowtieracing is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Finland
Posts: 1,919
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I just wish i would bought a cuda back then when they were affordable. I chose GM because there was a lot more good parts and knowhow available.

No with XV i wouldn think of an second to to choose their stuff. I think its allmost unreal how good products and systems they offer

Can someone donate me a cuda ?
__________________
63 Z06
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net