...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Lateral-G Open Discussions > Open Discussion
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-11-2005, 07:11 AM
Payton King's Avatar
Payton King Payton King is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 2,576
Thanks: 0
Thanked 23 Times in 18 Posts
Default Would you rather own a 03-05 Viper or Camaro?

Since Scott posed the question on the 69 Camaro I got to thinking, as much as these cars are bringing and cost to build. Would I rather have a new style Viper or a pro-tour 69? I saw an 03 Viper for $60,000 with 1500 miles.

I would like to hear(read) your opinions before I give mine. Someone give me an email address and I will send you a picture to post on this thread.

Thanks,

Payton
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-11-2005, 07:20 AM
XcYZ's Avatar
XcYZ XcYZ is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Rochester, Minnesota
Posts: 8,998
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Payton, send the pic to me, I'll take care of it.

As for your question, I'd go with the 69 Camaro. Anyone can go buy a Viper, but it takes a dedicated enthusiast to build a 69 like yours.
__________________
Scott

My LS7 69 Camaro
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-11-2005, 07:27 AM
T Bell T Bell is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 520
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Are you serious. It would have to be the Camaro. True enough both cars are rare on the streets. Both cars will bring attention. Both are fast. The viper just doesn't have that V8 sound. (I guess those 2 other cylinders does something to it). The 69 has heritage and shows courage to drive and build a 36 year old car. I guess you could also buy a decked out protouring 69 also. Hmmm. It might be the fact that you know that the Viper was built by a factory. Just knowing the 69 would have had so many custom things done to it along with a restoration would be enough for me. I just appreciate mechanical work. Sorry so long, I'm tried to put my thoughts on paper but I may not have done such a good job.
__________________
1972 Nova 355, 4 spd, rusty but something to drive.
1972 Pro-touring Cutlass S in the works....still
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-11-2005, 07:44 AM
907rs's Avatar
907rs 907rs is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Anchorage
Posts: 2,693
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I'd do the '69 as well. As Scott said, anyone can buy a Viper.

There's just something about vintage iron, especially one that can compare to the new 'super cars' in all performance aspects.
__________________
Bill
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-11-2005, 07:55 AM
BC69's Avatar
BC69 BC69 is offline
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 1,166
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Id take the Viper! Thrash around in it without worry for a few years...tear the drive train out, suspension, brakes, all when Im done with it. And slap it in a 70 Cuda. Then sell it for 150k! Come out on top! Lets just ignore the cost of building the Cuda!
__________________
In memory of those gone before us
In gratitude for those who care.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-11-2005, 08:17 AM
evilzee28 evilzee28 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 469
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

No contest, '69 Camaro. As I see it, if you've got the cash & buy a Viper it's pretty much the same as all the others, they're all belly button cars. Whereas the Camaros are all different apart from the basic body styling & each has been built to fulfil its owners certain criteria, handling, performance & individuality.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-11-2005, 08:19 AM
MarkM66's Avatar
MarkM66 MarkM66 is offline
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: St. Louis MO
Posts: 1,962
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Late Models suck. Anyone can buy one, and they all depreciate.

Camaro all the way.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-11-2005, 08:44 AM
Stuart Adams Stuart Adams is offline
Lateral-g Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,046
Thanks: 19
Thanked 62 Times in 38 Posts
Default Car

69 Camaro, and E55 for traveling.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-11-2005, 08:45 AM
DCreations DCreations is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Oakland,Ca
Posts: 273
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Viper all the way
__________________
Dave
“Tony Tony Tony, I know that your horny, but there’s
somethin bout that Bush ain’t right”
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-11-2005, 08:48 AM
Steve1968LS2's Avatar
Steve1968LS2 Steve1968LS2 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim Hills, CA
Posts: 5,534
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Here is the difference..

The Viper will depreciate every year and the Camaro will appreciate every year.

Besides, In 10 years the Viper will just be a has-been used car and the Camaro will be even more cool.

Not that I would not want a Viper but it is just not the same. I tell you what, finish your car and park it next to a brand new Viper at cruise night.. see which one has the bigger crowds throughout the night.
__________________
"A ship in port is safe, but that's not what ships are built for."

See Bad Penny run the cones: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GUPPIX-92U

1971 Chevelle Wagon - Roadster Shop Chassis ProCharged Shafiroff LS and lots of yada yada

1968 Camaro - Project Track Rat - 440 RHS LS
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net