...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Chassis and Suspension
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-21-2005, 08:18 AM
SSDan SSDan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wharton, TX
Posts: 35
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default 72 Chevelle Global West Susp?

I have a 72 Chevelle with a 454 bored .060 with a BDS 8-71 Blower. I'm at the stage of wanting to do something to improve the old stock suspension. After looking through the net and checking several vendors, Global West seemed to fit my need.

The question is...I'm looking at going with the CAT 5 system from and rear. I still run 15 inch rims. I will use their Wilwood 4 piston brakes. The package lowers the body 1" with their spindles, which I think I can tolerate, with my Rick's SS gas tank and Hooker headers, that are a bit low.

I'm not much into the lowered look(Sorry, but I like to go against the trend). They(Global West) talk like this will make my Chevelle more responsive.

Is this the way to go or are their better soluttions?

I mostly use the car cruising and may take it to the drags infrequently.

Any advice will be appreciated!

Dan Mascheck
Wharton, TX
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-21-2005, 09:57 AM
XcYZ's Avatar
XcYZ XcYZ is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Rochester, Minnesota
Posts: 8,998
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Welcome to the site, Dan.

What exactly are your goals? It looks like you know what you want for ride height and brake sizing based on wheel diameter... are you just wanting to update the suspension or make it handle like a modern street car (with an 8-71 of course).
__________________
Scott

My LS7 69 Camaro
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-21-2005, 04:47 PM
SSDan SSDan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wharton, TX
Posts: 35
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Global West

That's basically it! I would like my 72 to handle more responsively. The question is...is Global West the way to go! I have looked at several other companies, but the over all package seemed to be west with Global West!

I was also told I need to upgrade my steering to 12:1 to get the best out of the system. Another person told me I have 16:! and 12:1 is not much difference. Who do you believe?

If there is a better direction, I'd like to know before I plunk down the cash!!

Thanks

Dan
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-21-2005, 05:27 PM
Bill Howell Bill Howell is offline
Site Sponsor
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Pigeon Forge, Tn.
Posts: 967
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

You are aware that you will not be able to continue running the 15" wheels right. They will just not work when you upgrade the brake system.
__________________
Bill Howell
www.americanstreetcarseries.com
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-21-2005, 06:15 PM
Derek69SS's Avatar
Derek69SS Derek69SS is offline
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Dexter, MN
Posts: 963
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

OK, assuming you want a mild street setup:

My suggestion for the front: Stage II package from SC&C http://www.scandc.com/suspensions.htm - This will do more for you than the GW setup by a long-shot. You have the option to keep your stock brakes and 15" wheels, your geometry is improved, It's cheaper, and you reduce bump-steer and keep your turning radius. It will drop your car about 3/4" in front. Something like a Hotchkis spring and a 1-1/8" sway bar will work well if you want to keep the smooth ride, and don't intend to autocross the car.

In the rear, keep your stock upper arms and put new rubber bushings in them. Lowers, you could use the factory F-41 style boxed arms and 7/8" F-41 sway-bar. Again, just use rubber bushings. Don't use any poly-urethane/poly-graphite or delrin bushings in the rear. The binding will make the car ride like crap, and handle mediocre at best.

now if you want to autocross it... I've got some different suggestions

Last edited by Derek69SS; 11-21-2005 at 06:18 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-21-2005, 08:44 PM
Blown353 Blown353 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Central Valley, CA
Posts: 925
Thanks: 0
Thanked 88 Times in 34 Posts
Default

GW makes good quality stuff but the geometry provided by the B-body spindles leaves a lot to be desired in terms of steering ratio, bump steer, and ackermann. It does work (only in terms of providing a more favorable camber curve) but it's not an ideal setup-- you get three negatives for the one gain. I run it right now (wanna buy it? LOL!) but plan on upgrading it soon.

As Derek said, best bets *right now* is to use stock spindles with the Howe tall ball joints, or for more money Marcus's G5 setup with modded C5 'Vette spindles, or wait a bit longer (probably about January) for the packages using the new ATS spindle.

You can still use the GW lower arms (even the uppers) though with any of the above setups; the GW arms are super beefy and good quality.

As far as the rear, best "off the shelf" option currently would be the GW TBC-4 lower rears or Currie Currietrac lower rears paired with Edelbrock or Currie upper arms. You aren't going to to much better than that with off the shelf parts and maintain the factory 4-link. If you want to do a little fab, you can make your own upper and lower arms with spherical joints and use the Wolfe Racecraft spherical joints in the upper rear end. There are a lot of better options out there but you're getting into cut-n-weld territory-- how far do you want to go?

I can't offer much in the way of spring suggestion for your application as all my knowledge comes from a car with an SBC over the nose.

Troy
__________________
1969 Chevelle
Old setup: Procharged/intercooled/EFI 353 SBC, TKO, ATS/SPC/Global West suspension, C6 brakes & hydroboost.
In progress: LS2, 3.0 Whipple, T56 Magnum, torque arm & watts link, Wilwood Aero6/4 brakes, Mk60 ABS, Vaporworx, floater 9" rear, etc.

Last edited by Blown353; 11-22-2005 at 08:55 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-22-2005, 04:28 AM
SSDan SSDan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wharton, TX
Posts: 35
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Global West Susp

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Howell
You are aware that you will not be able to continue running the 15" wheels right. They will just not work when you upgrade the brake system.
Bill, with the 11" 4 piston Wilwoods, I can still keep my 15" mags. I would like to upgrade to 17", but the Global West upgrade is over $5000, and I still want to get the car painted, so...for now they will have to wait.

Also I may tub the rear....I notice more very wide tires in the 15" class than in the 17"'s. For now the tires have to wait.

Thanks for the help!

Dan
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-22-2005, 06:22 AM
sinned's Avatar
sinned sinned is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: in the dirt...looking for the apex
Posts: 250
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SSDan
but the Global West upgrade is over $5000, and I still want to get the car painted, so...for now they will have to wait. Dan
WHAT!!! They get 5K for that junk!?!?! I'm in the wrong business, for 5K you are getting-

Teflon bushings (not bad, actually, pretty good, a set runs 100.00)
Some decent tubular arms (can be had for under 1K for the full set elsewhere)
Springs (not enough pressure and can be had for 100.00)
Tall spindles (70.00 at any wrecking yard)
Misc bearings, seals, and hardware (100.00 at any part store)
Wilwood 11" brake kit with 4 pot calipers (Wilwood brake kit's run ~700.00 for that set-up)
Did I miss anything, I only come up with $2070 and that includes 1K for the tubular arms (which IMO is a wate of resourses)?

Wow, GW gets almost 3K for going through the trouble of putting in a package? See the thread you have over at PT for the tech on GW's neg roll kit.
__________________
Dennis
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-25-2005, 12:24 PM
65ss's Avatar
65ss 65ss is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: San Diego
Posts: 8
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Wow wish i had seen this thread earlier. I have a 65 A body I just finished putting b spindles, Baers 13 inch kit, and their bumpsteer kit, Hotchkis drop springs, roll bar, and upper control arms, and a 12.1 med effort box. So now I get to look foward to three problems I didn't have before just for some negitive camber??? Is there a different spindle I can use to keep steering geomatry??? Any suggestions other than removing it all?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-25-2005, 01:39 PM
sinned's Avatar
sinned sinned is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: in the dirt...looking for the apex
Posts: 250
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Try this or maybe here for more technical info. As for alternatives, here are a few; AFX spindle , SC&C tall ball joints , Fatman spindles .
__________________
Dennis

Last edited by dennis68; 11-25-2005 at 01:42 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net