...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Chassis and Suspension
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-23-2007, 06:45 AM
XcYZ's Avatar
XcYZ XcYZ is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Rochester, Minnesota
Posts: 8,998
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

If the car is tight, regardless of tire sizes, basic chassis changes like a lower front spring rate, higher rear spring rate, less sway bar and raising the panhard bar would help, if not correct the problem. These are basic principles of race car chassis setups (not counting tire pressures, shock settings, etc), but they should also be the basics when setting up a street car.

I know this post doesn't add much to what the original thread was about, but the topic of tire sizes and understeer comes up from time to time and I wanted to add my two cents.
__________________
Scott

My LS7 69 Camaro
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-23-2007, 08:04 AM
Steve1968LS2's Avatar
Steve1968LS2 Steve1968LS2 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim Hills, CA
Posts: 5,534
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Thier test car, running the subframe, was out a the Run Through The Hills autocross event and did VERY well. I think it was in the top 3, maybe even top two, times for cars on street tires (non-R-compound)

They also tested the car out here in CA at the El Toro Marine base. I can't release the numbers but the car did very good. I think it almost got a 1g on the skidpad. Again, on non-r-compound tires.

Their chassis uses a lot of DSE parts including chuncks of thier hydoformed subframe.

Anyways, it's a cool car and beat the snot out of it. lol

__________________
"A ship in port is safe, but that's not what ships are built for."

See Bad Penny run the cones: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GUPPIX-92U

1971 Chevelle Wagon - Roadster Shop Chassis ProCharged Shafiroff LS and lots of yada yada

1968 Camaro - Project Track Rat - 440 RHS LS
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-23-2007, 01:15 PM
mazspeed's Avatar
mazspeed mazspeed is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Campbell Ca
Posts: 2,005
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve1968LS2
Thier test car, running the subframe, was out a the Run Through The Hills autocross event and did VERY well. I think it was in the top 3, maybe even top two, times for cars on street tires (non-R-compound)

They also tested the car out here in CA at the El Toro Marine base. I can't release the numbers but the car did very good. I think it almost got a 1g on the skidpad. Again, on non-r-compound tires.

Their chassis uses a lot of DSE parts including chuncks of thier hydoformed subframe.

Anyways, it's a cool car and beat the snot out of it. lol

I saw that car at the last goodguys event here in Aug. They had a display of chassis and the quality looked killer. Yeah, that has a big block merlin right? It was nice, and had bugs on it, which means they drive it.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-23-2007, 02:01 PM
R67Chevelle R67Chevelle is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Back in Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 146
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Reason for my interest is that the rear tires on a stock chassis is max 10" on the rear. On my chevelle the chassis is not rigid at all and want a firmer handling and more stable ride. The weight difference would be a interesting issue. Also the time is consuming in redoing the stock frame. It would be nice to roll a new chassis and be ready to finish the paint and body. The price after all the options are definately going to be over 20k and not too pleased about this, but you camaro guys have some awesome chassis options out there.

With the orange 66 chevelle the RS concerts has is a neat car. I do not like any wheel over 18" on a chevelle.. It does not to me look any good. I would like a 18X12 wheel in the rear and a 18X9 in the front. Cornering is not the biggest factor but I want something with 700-850hp and need a stable chassis and rear tire to handle the power on the street.

Thanks for all the input. This decission helps. My project is now a complete redo. Not going to cut coners this time, Had the velle for 22 years now and I want to do the build like I have always wanted.

Blessings,
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-24-2007, 07:18 AM
MarkM66's Avatar
MarkM66 MarkM66 is offline
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: St. Louis MO
Posts: 1,962
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by R67Chevelle
Reason for my interest is that the rear tires on a stock chassis is max 10" on the rear. On my chevelle the chassis is not rigid at all and want a firmer handling and more stable ride. The weight difference would be a interesting issue. Also the time is consuming in redoing the stock frame. It would be nice to roll a new chassis and be ready to finish the paint and body. The price after all the options are definately going to be over 20k and not too pleased about this, but you camaro guys have some awesome chassis options out there.

With the orange 66 chevelle the RS concerts has is a neat car. I do not like any wheel over 18" on a chevelle.. It does not to me look any good. I would like a 18X12 wheel in the rear and a 18X9 in the front. Cornering is not the biggest factor but I want something with 700-850hp and need a stable chassis and rear tire to handle the power on the street.

Thanks for all the input. This decission helps. My project is now a complete redo. Not going to cut coners this time, Had the velle for 22 years now and I want to do the build like I have always wanted.

Blessings,
It takes more then a chassis to fit a 12" wheel, you'll also have to mini tub it.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-28-2007, 05:09 PM
Roadster Shop's Avatar
Roadster Shop Roadster Shop is offline
Supporting Vendor

RoadsterShop.com

 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,120
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Hi everyone. Quick intro. My name is Phil and I am one of the owners of the Roadster Shop (RS Performance) and was the one driving the orange Chevelle at Run to The Hillls. I am new to the message boards so bear with me a little.

There are definitely more advantages to our chassis than just strength. Bolt on componets are just that...bolt on. Not to be putting anyone down, but when using an original frame as a starting point there are a good number of limitations that come into play. We are a chassis manufacturer for over 20 years and have always found that if you are looking for a change from stock, the best thing to do is start from scratch and design around the desired outcome rather than work around what is there, and settle for the outcome.

That in mind, we saw that the Chevelle frame and suspension left many things to be desired... performance handling, sloppy steering, body roll, strength, rigidity, accomodating a decent size wheel and tire, lowered ride height and many more.
To check out all of the specifics of the chassis please click on the link below.

http://www.roadstershop.com/rsperformance.htm

If anyone out there is interested in the chassis, I invite you to come talk with us at one of the shows. I would be more than happy to take you for a ride in the car, or around the autocross track (if available). A ride in that car is hands down better than any sales pitch or bench racing over specs!

Upcoming Shows:
Good Guys Ft. Worth, TX 10/5 - 10/7 Autocross event
Good Guys Pleasanton, CA 11/10 - 11/11
Good Guys Scottsdale, AZ 11/16 - 11/18
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-29-2007, 06:02 AM
andrewmp6 andrewmp6 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 641
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

i like it im with the rest of them stick with the stock frame and build it up. been me id go for art morrison or schwartzperformance.com
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-23-2007, 08:06 AM
Derek69SS's Avatar
Derek69SS Derek69SS is offline
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Dexter, MN
Posts: 963
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

In all honesty, you can get equal geometry improvements with bolt-on parts on your stock chassis for a LOT less money. The only real benefit I see over the right combination of bolt-ons is the added chassis rigidity.

The big rear tires are cool if you're not serious about road-racing/track days (which most of us aren't but if you are...), they will come up to temp much slower than the smaller fronts, effecting the balance of the car differently throughout the run... if it starts neutral, when the fronts get sticky it will go loose, then the fronts get too hot as the rears just start to get sticky and it goes tight. They also require running the springs/shocks further inboard negatively effecting the motion-ratios.

Edit: ...should add the big tires may help on a tight course such as an autocross, but likely a hinderance on a big course.

Last edited by Derek69SS; 09-23-2007 at 08:22 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-23-2007, 12:38 PM
XcYZ's Avatar
XcYZ XcYZ is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Rochester, Minnesota
Posts: 8,998
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Derek69SS
The big rear tires are cool if you're not serious about road-racing/track days (which most of us aren't but if you are...), they will come up to temp much slower than the smaller fronts, effecting the balance of the car differently throughout the run... if it starts neutral, when the fronts get sticky it will go loose, then the fronts get too hot as the rears just
start to get sticky and it goes tight.
I will agree with that, but if you're going to look at how the tire temp changes are different with different size tires, then you might as well start looking at everything, such as fuel load. As you use fuel your balance is going to change, just like it will with tire temps. I know some guys that used to race using methanol but have switched to race gas because you don't use nearly as much over the course of the race, which means the change in balance isn't as drastic.

Of course, with street tires, this is just about pointless. lol But if you're serious about competing (in sanctioned racing), nothing is left out of the equation.

I still say that tire sizes differences from front to rear can be dialed in with the right chassis setup.
__________________
Scott

My LS7 69 Camaro
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-23-2007, 01:09 PM
68protouring454's Avatar
68protouring454 68protouring454 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,593
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

they were out of the top 5 until they got to hot lap it 4-5 extra laps to knock the last 2-3 10ths off, at the end before the top 5, the car is cool and did well for a boat..
cool chassis, and they were nice guys too.
__________________
Jake's Rod Shop

Last edited by 68protouring454; 09-23-2007 at 02:05 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net