460 RHS engine build.. dyno tomorrow. - Page 2 - Lateral-g Forums

**Steve1968LS2** · #11 09-27-2010, 09:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mkelcy

[OT]Out of curiosity are you still running the 21st Century headers? If so, you may run into issues with the oil filter adapter on the Autocraft pan. In my project, I had to make the output/input for the filter entirely within the adapter to get clearance for the number 7 tube on the headers. Take a look here for what I'm talking about: http://www.pro-touring.com/forum/sho...&postcount=108[/OT]

Yes to the 21st Century stepped headers.. and the oil adaptor could be an issue.. BUT.. when the engine goes into the car the oil filter adaptor will be switched over to a Canton AN adaptor (same as I used before) since Penny has a remote filter. This just makes the engine easier to plumb on the dyno.

But thanks for the heads up.. since you mentioned it I'm going to see if I would of had the same issue.

**Steve1968LS2** · #12 09-27-2010, 09:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 509Chevelle

In number terms...I'll say 700 hp. In word play...I'll say it'll fly like a bat out of hell!! By the way it is oh-so beautiful. May I ask, what cfm size throttle body are you using?

On the dyno it will be a FAST 102mm.. on the car it will be TBW 90mm unit that has been custom ported my Mike Norris. Wish it were bigger but it is what it is.

**Steve1968LS2** · #13 09-27-2010, 09:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Autokraft

I'm going with 680

Great pan.. Tom was really impressed and said he's going to order a couple from you for the shop.

I had to mod yours a bit to clear my front rack.. and I added a bung for an oil tep sender.

I need you to send me a replacement sticker.. had to remove it to weld.

ProdigyCustoms · #14 09-27-2010, 09:14 PM

I might be wrong but I am guessing the 114LC and bigger heads hurt torque. Guess it depends on how sucsessful the low number work was.

What cam was in the other motor?

**Steve1968LS2** · #15 09-27-2010, 09:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ProdigyCustoms

I might be wrong but I am guessing the 114LC and bigger heads hurt torque. Guess it depends on how sucsessful the low number work was.

What cam was in the other motor?

Just a touch smaller with less seperation due to the cathedral port heads..

The 114 was installed at 110.5 .. should help and the 1 7/8" headers will move up the torque as well.. Pretty sure my last cam (on the 454) was 114 set on a 111.

Too many numbers, can't keep them all in my head.

Vegas69 · #16 09-27-2010, 10:06 PM

Why aren't you going to dyno it with your intake? I have no clue what you'll make but I'll guess 672 hp/621tq.

**GregWeld** · #17 09-27-2010, 10:17 PM

652 TQ and 695 HP (but HP number depends on what you're willing to rev it to).

No matter what it makes -- it is killer (on paper) and I hope it works even better than your best laid plans!

**Rybar** · #18 09-28-2010, 12:32 AM

I guessed your 454 motor on the button last time.

I'll say 675 hp and 630 tq.

This is an insanely killer motor, please upgrade it down the road so you can sell it to me

67ragtp · #19 09-28-2010, 04:50 AM

665hp / 644ftlbs killer engine

Rich

**Steve1968LS2** · #20 09-28-2010, 06:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vegas69

Why aren't you going to dyno it with your intake? I have no clue what you'll make but I'll guess 672 hp/621tq.

Huh?

Are you talking throttle body? If so then it's because most dynos, including this one can't run TBW stuff yet.

Once in the car will be chassis dyno tested to see what the car makes, but that's a different topic all together